Missoula passes anti-discrimination ordinance
MISSOULA — The Missoula City Council passed an ordinance Tuesday
that protects residents from housing and employment discrimination
based on “actual or perceived” sexual orientation and gender
identity.
“Most of us can’t remember civil rights in action,” said council
member Stacy Rye, an ordinance sponsor. “This is it for us. This is
our lifetimes.”
Council members voted 10-2 early Tuesday in favor of the ordinance,
which the Montana Human Rights Network says is the first of its
kind in the state.
“Hopefully our actions tonight will ripple through Montana from
Libby to Billings, from Dillon to Wolf Point, and eventually to the
capital in Helena,” said council member Dave Strohmaier, another
sponsor of the ordinance.
The
vote came after a nearly seven-hour meeting in which opponents
argued that the ordinance would make women and children more
vulnerable to “peeping toms and cross-dressing pedophiles” in
public restrooms.
Dustin Hankinson of Missoula said some of the opposing arguments
were “insane.”
“We
are America. Freedom,” Hankinson said. “We cannot claim to be the
paragon of freedom and liberty and still maintain that it is
absolutely acceptable to oppress people for who they are. It’s
contradictory.”
The
council heard testimony about two women who were unable to purchase
a condominium when it became clear to the owner that that they were
a lesbian couple, while a 17-year-old girl said she had been
repeatedly harassed and received two death threats for being a
lesbian, even though she is not.
She
said she wanted to point out that the ordinance recognition of
discrimination by “perceived” sexual orientation could apply to
heterosexuals as well.
Missoula pastor Ron Thiessen said he didn’t believe the council
should advance such a political agenda.
“I
do not mock their pain, but social policy is not the place to
resolve discord in their lives,” he said.
The
ordinance also applies to public accommodations such as restaurants
and hotels.
Councilwoman Lyn Hellegaard voted against the ordinance, saying she
was concerned it violated the Constitution.