Legals for May, 27 2021

No. 27845 FLATHEAD COUNTY TREASURER, STATE OF MONTANA FLATHEAD COUNTY TREASURER, Plaintiff, vs PATTY SEAMAN HOMES 4000 HIGHWAY 2 EAST KALISPELL, MT 59901 Defendant. ASSESSOR NO. T205350 NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE TO BE SOLD, at Sheriff's Sale on the 3rd day of June, 2021 at 11:00 AM, at 2560 Airport Road, Kalispell in the County of Flathead, pursuant to the Writ of Execution entered by the Flathead County Treasurer, that certain personal property more particularly described as follows: 1977 LIBERTY 14x56 MOBILE HOME SN#W4733 TITLE AA2018197 The Sheriff's Sale is for unpaid/delinquent taxes for the above Assessor Number. Dated this 25th day of May, 2021 Brian Heino Sheriff of Flathead County, Montana By: Jeff Weyh Jeff Weyh, Civil Clerk May 27, 2021 MNAXLP --------------------------------------------

No. 27841 Opportunity to Object Stovepipe Project USDA Forest Service Flathead National Forest Tally Lake Ranger District Flathead County, Montana The Tally Lake Ranger District of the Flathead National Forest has prepared an updated environmental assessment (EA) and a draft decision notice (DN) and finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for the Stovepipe Project. The responsible official for this project is Tally Lake District Ranger, Bill Mulholland. The updated EA and draft DN/FONSI are available on the web at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=58217. Additional information can be obtained from: Tami MacKenzie, 650 Wolfpack Way, Kalispell MT, 59901. (406)270-9870 or by email at tamara.mackenzie@usda.gov The Stovepipe Project is subject to the objection process pursuant to 36 CFR 218, subparts A and B. How to file an Objection and Timeframe: Objections will only be accepted from those who have previously submitted specific written comments regarding the proposed project during scoping or other designated opportunity for public comment in accordance with §218.5(a). Issues raised in objections must be based on previously submitted timely, specific written comments regarding the proposed project unless based on new information arising after the designated comment opportunities. Objections, including attachments, must be filed via mail (to Objection Reviewing Officer, USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, 26 Fort Missoula Road, Missoula, MT 59804); faxed to (406) 329-3411; or emailed to appeals-northern-regional-office@usda.gov. Electronic objections should be submitted in rich text (.rtf), Word (.doc or .docx), or .pdf formats. Objections must be submitted within 45 calendar days following the publication of this notice in the Daily Inter Lake. The publication date in the newspaper of record is the exclusive means for calculating the time to file an objection. Those wishing to object should not rely upon dates or timeframe information provided by any other source. The regulations prohibit extending the time to file an objection. The objection must contain the minimum content requirements specified in §218.8(d) and incorporation of documents by reference is permitted only as provided in§218.8(b). It is the objector's responsibility to ensure timely filing of a written objection with the reviewing officer pursuant to §218.9. All objections are available for public inspection during and after the objection process. At a minimum an objection must include the following (36 CFR 218.8(d)): 1) The objector's name and address, with a telephone number, if available; 2) a signature or other verification of authorship upon request (a scanned signature for email may be filed with the objection); 3) when multiple names are listed on an objection, identification of the lead objector (verification of the identity of the lead objector shall be provided upon request); 4) the name of the proposed project, the name and title of the responsible official, and the name(s) of the national forest(s) and/or ranger district(s) on which the proposed project will be implemented; and 5) a description of those aspects of the proposed project addressed by the objection, including specific issues related to the proposed project if applicable, how the objector believes the environmental analysis or draft decision specifically violates law, regulation, or policy; suggested remedies that would resolve the objection; supporting reasons for the reviewing officer to consider; and 6) a statement that demonstrates connection between prior specific written comments on the particular proposed project or activity and the content of the objection. May 27, 2020 MNAXLP --------------------------------------------